Burning Question: Worst Books You've read

Hilly recently posted a meme that consisted of a list of 100 books, and other readers were supposed to examine the list and do their own variation on it. While I am not doing the meme, it did make me stop and think about some of the great books I read, and then as a sidenote, I began to think about the worst books I ever read. Now, this doesn't mean that they are in fact bad, and I have to be clear about that since at least one of my selections is likely to be someone's favorite, so keep that in mind.

Now because of the commitment involved, you most likely didn't finish some of the worst books you ever tried to read, and I understand that, so they count. I mean, there are a lot of books that I started and didn't finish. And there are others that you've probably forgotten(or repressed) that you can't or won't talk about either. Novels you've read for school count as well.

When thinking about the question, the first title that came to my mind was this book called World Without End by Sean Russell. I read it about a decade ago, and I did manage to finish it, but, wow, it really did not appeal to me, despite the fact that at the time I was into both fantasy and the history of early modern science. It just didn't captivate me.

I also recalled my grade 10 English class where we had to read both A Separate Peace by John Knowles and Salinger's Catcher in the Rye, and I hated them both. The less said about A Separate Peace the better, but I would like to note that the reason I don't like Catcher in the Rye is Holden Caufield isn't really the most likable of characters. I think my words at the time was that he was "a whiny bitch", and to this day I feel comfortable with that assessment.

So, what are some of the worst books you ever read?

Tags: world without end, burning question, sean russell, scientific method, catcher in the rye, separate peace, salinger, knowles, worst book, snackie's world, holden caufield